CNN新闻附字幕[译]：加州同性婚姻案例争吵正式开

We hA片 e five years of information thathttp://

可是我可以确定在50个州都容许同性婚姻是不大可能的，但明天的争持对我来说不寻常的是通常会有一个模式，案例被称为加州提案8http://

1868? 甚么时候把同性朋友从婚姻排除出去变得差别宪了？是1791年仍是1868年？ When did it become unconstitutional to prohibit interracial marriages? 甚么时候胁制异族通婚变得差别宪了？ Don't give me a question to my question. 不要答非所问， if both a woman and a man are over the age of 55，结合你在最高法庭见过的其它案件， When did it become unconstitutional to exclude homoshitual couples from marriage， Jeff? What makes you think that? 你为甚么这么说呢， plenty of oral argument outside as well，法官在存眷的是哪些点http://

添油加醋的投机办法让他们但愿找到一个编制以避免做出一些令人震惊的结论， uh. 夫妻两边都没有生育能力是极为罕见的，有些人是为了美国日益增长的同性恋人群争取应有的权利，仅供团体学习利用， justices grilled both sides， some were not. He has a mixed batting A片 erage. But what was very unusual to me about today's argument is that usually there's a pattern. Usually you can identify what the key issues are and what the court is focusing on. What was so confusing about today is they jumped around to so many different issues and even the liberals didn't all agree on everything and the conservatives didn't all agree on everything.